<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vadimtropashko.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/finally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vadimtropashko.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/finally/</link>
	<description>with occasional pedestrian SQL topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://vadimtropashko.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/finally/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vadimtropashko.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>See error text from ORA-32043, 32044, 32045 for more insight into factored sub-query recursion.

32043 &quot;recursive WITH clause needs an initialization branch&quot;
// *Cause: A WITH clause query referred to itself (recursive) but did not
//         have a branch in a UNION ALL with no references to itself (the
//         initialization branch or anchor member).
// *Action: Rewrite the recursive WITH query to have a branch in a UNION
//          ALL operation with no references to itself.
32044 &quot;cycle detected while executing recursive WITH query&quot;
// *Cause: A recursive WITH clause query produced a cycle and was stopped
//         in order to avoid an infinite loop.
// *Action: Rewrite the recursive WITH query to stop the recursion or use
//          the CYCLE clause.
32045 &quot;maximum level of recursion reached while executing recursive WITH query&quot;
// *Cause: A recursive WITH query reached the maximum level of recursion
//         specified and was stopped.
// *Action: Increase the maximum level of recursion or use the CYCLE clause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See error text from ORA-32043, 32044, 32045 for more insight into factored sub-query recursion.</p>
<p>32043 &#8220;recursive WITH clause needs an initialization branch&#8221;<br />
// *Cause: A WITH clause query referred to itself (recursive) but did not<br />
//         have a branch in a UNION ALL with no references to itself (the<br />
//         initialization branch or anchor member).<br />
// *Action: Rewrite the recursive WITH query to have a branch in a UNION<br />
//          ALL operation with no references to itself.<br />
32044 &#8220;cycle detected while executing recursive WITH query&#8221;<br />
// *Cause: A recursive WITH clause query produced a cycle and was stopped<br />
//         in order to avoid an infinite loop.<br />
// *Action: Rewrite the recursive WITH query to stop the recursion or use<br />
//          the CYCLE clause.<br />
32045 &#8220;maximum level of recursion reached while executing recursive WITH query&#8221;<br />
// *Cause: A recursive WITH query reached the maximum level of recursion<br />
//         specified and was stopped.<br />
// *Action: Increase the maximum level of recursion or use the CYCLE clause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim Tropashko</title>
		<link>http://vadimtropashko.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/finally/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim Tropashko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vadimtropashko.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-898</guid>
		<description>Exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troels Arvin</title>
		<link>http://vadimtropashko.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/finally/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Troels Arvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vadimtropashko.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-897</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s interesting. It the following interpretation correct?:
Oracle currently doesn&#039;t support SQL:1999 recursive (WITH RECURSIVE), but it&#039;s in a beta-version of an Oracle 11 update?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting. It the following interpretation correct?:<br />
Oracle currently doesn&#8217;t support SQL:1999 recursive (WITH RECURSIVE), but it&#8217;s in a beta-version of an Oracle 11 update?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
